While it’s more important than ever to be cautious about what we post and how we want ourselves to be represented online, we can’t actually control what other people are searching for or how they’re perceiving us. It’s only normal for them to search us; it’s where the majority of our hidden activities are able to be seen. Many use it to post photos of what they’re up to or what they’re into. Not only that, it is a major form of communication for relationships of all types. But is this a fair way to get to know someone or perceive someone? Is what people find on your social media platforms an accurate portrayal of who you truly are?
Well, over the past 20 years, the world as we know it has been taken by storm through the beginning of social media. According to Comscore about 90 percent of U.S. Internet users visit a social media site each and every month more then once. Because we live in such a largely global-society, creating and maintaining an online presence has become extremely relevant in promoting individual brands and expanding our social network. As we know, perception is everything; especially in the world of internet. In terms of perception, we all have an ideal self. We all wish to maximize our careers, our profession, and desire to be like those who we discover to be most successful. As the use of social media continues to evolve; the concept of presenting our ideal selves versus our real selves has become more and more predominant on social media platforms such as Facebook, Twitter, Instagram, Pinterest, Skype, Voodoo, Vine, Tumbler, and etc.
As research and many analyst suggests, your “real self” is what you are (your attributes, your characteristics, and your personality). Your “ideal self” is what you feel you should be; much of it due to social and environmental influences. From a societal standpoint, research and surveys show that many of us are driven by rivalry, achievement, and status; hence, the creation and long portrayal of our ideal selves.
Knowing that, reflect on the idea of social media sites, and how we consider our profiles to be presentations of who we are. Therefore, through communication with the social standard, the real and ideal selves intersect; and the ideal self is at least partially actualized. In essence, our online selves represent our ideals and eliminate many of our other real components.
So the question we have to ask ourselves is: Are we really presenting who we are or are we presenting an idealistic version of ourselves? Ultimately it has been argued that the social media effect creates a false sense of self and self-esteem through the use of likes, fans, comments, posts, etc. For many social media users, it is an esteem booster, which explains why so many people spend so much time on social media. It provides many individuals with a false sense of self and an inflated sense of who they really are. The deeper we dig and the more we research, it still comes to the same result of: will we truly ever know the millions of online personality versus the real ones? This question has been baffling me since the day I joined my LEP 400 Internet and Identity Online class. With all the tests and research results proving that we display different personalities online than opposed our real life situations; our real life is still being judged regardless of the falsehood of ideas we dream of and share to the world.
During this class and throughout a series of well thought questions, this idea has started to intrigue me deeply. In one discussion particular, we discussed a test and applied this test to our online profiles. It is called Apply Magic Sauce. This is used widely by HR departments and employers to determine a candidates personality and discover who they are as a person. Not only does it impact a persons future, it also plays a heavy role on perceptions and the ideas people choose to see. For example, I applied this Magic Sauce test to my Facebook profile; the results were almost 100% inaccurate.
According to the magic sauce test I am 26 years old, 13% feminine, more impulsive and spontaneous than 64% of the population, display more trust and teamwork than 88% of population, am more emotional and easily stressed than 52% of the population, have no major religious preference, more liberal and uninvolved in politics, more intelligent than 75% of population, and lastly, more happy with my life than 68% of the population.
For starters, I do not get stressed easily at all. It takes a very heavy load or life event to make me stressed. I am also not very emotional. I usually keep my emotions to myself and rarely show them. I am only 20 but like to believe that I act way more mature than what my age reveals. I also feel as if I am very intelligent and I truly do not have a specific religious preference. I usually have the same schedule as well. Not creating a very spontaneous life for myself.
The magic sauce test was very intriguing to read and discover the “so called self” based on a tests calculations and systematic combination result. In the article, Telegraph of London has given to the project, it says, “Some things about it are interesting and some are a little scary, in terms of what computers are capable of.” That wraps up exactly what I am feeling and thinking. It is harmless fun to view it and look at it yourself, but I fear that if jobs and other future markets start acquiring this test, it will place us into a large sample and leave no room to variation. Every human brain registers and views things differently. One person may like something because it’s funny but others may like it because it relays a special message and is not funny. Everyone likes and doesn’t like things for millions of different reasons. So how can we possibly jumble it all into one test and know exactly what individual people are thinking?
Many people in the class comments discussed how the test was either accurate or not. I struggled with the idea that the test could even be remotely correct for anyone! However, we all display different emotions online for very different reasons. The video below discusses the types of personalities we display online and what they mean.
With all the research and questions about online identities out there, one rapidly expanding area of psychological research is the study of how participation in social media affects everyday relationships, behaviors, and influences real-life identity.
Scientists are discovering that what an individual says and does online influences everyday relationships and behavior. “Researchers have known for a while that individuals give unique cues about who they are with the things they own, clothes they wear, things they say and do. However, though these cues are informative to knowing who someone truly is, they were not always so easily accessible to our entire social network,” says Lindsay Graham of the University of Texas, Austin. “Now with much of our lives being lived online, and the boundaries having been blurred between who sees these cues and who doesn’t, it is all the more important to pay attention to the kinds of impressions we are giving off to those around us.”
In a set of recent studies, Psych Central examined 50 randomly selected cafes and bars in the Austin area and looked at the profile pictures of people who attended those establishments using the social networking site Foursquare.com. Just by looking at the profile photos of the frequent patrons for each location, observers were able to assess the personality of the average patron (extraverted, likeable, narcissistic), the activities likely to occur at the establishment (drinking, surfing the web, flirting), and the atmosphere or “vibe” of the location itself (sophisticated, clean, classy, etc.).
So with the researchers finding evidence that personality and specific types of attributes affect how we display ourselves online, it boils down to the question of… Does our online persona truly reflect who we are?
My final answer is no. There may be correlations in profile pictures and statuses/places on Facebook but there is no correlations in the results of likes, personality tests, and true brain activities. The human brain surpasses over 40,000 thoughts a day. Keep in mind every human brain surpasses over 40,000 different thoughts than the person standing next to them or across the world. The National Science Foundation has been studying the human brain for years and still cannot fully understand how each and every brain runs a different idea and thought process. So how can we possibly correlate “likes” on Facebook or words in a status to a humans personality and their real self? I truly believe it is an unreachable task. To study every single human brain and dissect every thought is impossible.
Many people share, like, or post information on social media sites for approval, attention, or simply for communication and excitement. That may show the depths of their soul and how they are feeling, but what they truly believe in, their interests, and their real personalities do not shine through a computer. Any employer or business that believes in online personalities as a reliable source for selecting candidates is making a major mistake. Any person who believes they know someone based upon technology and what they see online, is also making a major mistake. Our online selves represent our ideals and eliminate many of our other real components.

Check out these sources and amazing articles below!
“#selfiesteem – Online Personality Types.” YouTube. YouTube. Web. 12 Dec. 2015.
Green, Kay. “The Social Media Effect: Are You Really Who You Portray Online?” The Huffington Post. TheHuffingtonPost.com, 7 Aug. 2013. Web. 12 Dec. 2015.
Koifman, Natasha. “Do Our Online Personas Truly Reflect Who We Are?” The Huffington Post. Web. 12 Dec. 2015.
“Research Areas.” Nsf.gov. Web. 12 Dec. 2015.
“The Facebook Test: Does It Really Work?” The Telegraph. Telegraph Media Group. Web. 12 Dec. 2015.












